Modern Technology and Relationship b/w Media and Public
Media technologies are an important and main part of elected governance. Beginning from the newspaper culture of the untimely modern era to the television society of today, media technologies have been the sources by which sovereign rules of admired sovereignty, representation and responsibility keeps into practice. Satellites and computers are the two technologies specifically were both the sign of a change, which consequently reconfigured the network of communications and social bonding. Satellite broadcasting abolished differences as a key factor in contacts. Computer technology not only changed all the sources of mathematical calculation, but through efficiency widely used broader capacity for information, storage and recovery. The beaming are of a contact satellite 22,300 miles above the earth time and changed the world into one similar space (Baym 2005; Jones2005) the conquest of time and space with perfection of this technology has now in a way been realized the dream of the nineteenth-century romantics. Moreover, the aggressive transformation of publics into audiences-- which in the late nineteenth century created the "imaginary community of the nation" -- is now a global process (van Zoonen 2005).
While cable and satellite have enlarged the scale and scope of communications, they also -- paradoxically -- have narrowed it. Cable television has radically expanded channel capacity, the variety of services available and the capacity to segment the audience; wedded to satellites, cable was able to penetrate 60 percent of U.S. homes by the 1990s. Multichannel systems, however, have fragmented the audience into narrow niches based on taste, hobbies, avocations, race and ethnicity (van Zoonen 2005).
Newspapers and television is a mixture of cable TV, direct satellite and VCRs and seen be a huge audience. media defines all of the social relations of modem societies through these access and restrictions now. All subjects are organized around the concept that all local and external spaces and all public and private institutions are bowed by the narrower and small discussion of the mass media. (Baym 2005; Jones2005) Though the examination are festive or serious, no matter their mass media mutual dependence is made open or not, all investigations of modern society take the reach restricted of the mass media as absolute. Public reach to these media is very simple. Abundant access to the means of media production, exhibition, distribution, and reproduction of cultural offerings made media and public both accessible to each other.
People publicly represent themselves to the agencies of mass communication technologies in order to be represented by the technologies on their own. Technologies of mass media have given easy access to public so that a common can represent himself in news or talk shows (Curran, 1991). Everything that was previously private, through media and mobile technologies has become external and public. This is a fast come back of the mass media's fast suitability of the character. Since this unimaginable reversal, no emergency planning had been thought for tackling it. But, to the degree that the growth of the public opinion confronts become recognized for any way of the developed regulations, these targets will be met. It is obvious that the public community networks and internet can become under strain to finish or delete the recognised weak affects that these divided media use. Internet with its negatively changing relations of production like pornographic movies is signaling a coming Accidental Revolution, the contests and the loss will be enormous.
Advance technology has developed a strong relationship between media and public.
The Changing Role of Technologies in Media
Media technologies are technical in a broader sense of the many technological sources of creating, transferring, getting and saving texts, these advancements in technologies are of greater significance to the public of and institutions. As this is disappointing that social and political theory has, as John Thompson writes, gave a meagre care to the networking media which engages new types of accomplishments and communication (Thompson 1995: 4). In this advance era public spend most of its time in spending upon the social institutions of the family, education and the workplace. But these settings of public are transmitted by media technologies which enable people to choose or reject from the given choices, and which are also almost similar with the dominion of entertainment, where public spend quality time than previous modern followers.
Publicists no longer rely on the wire services or networks to transcend former geographic limitations. Instead, they can use facsimile, modems or overnight delivery services, or transmit video news releases by satellite. During 1994, direct broadcast satellite (DBS) service will enable North Americans to downlink programming on home dishes, similar to the capability enjoyed by Europeans for several years (Mindich 2005). It will be only a matter of time and economics until certain satellite frequencies and at least a portion of the much ballyhooed Information Superhighway will become dedicated commercial conduits.
Moreover, the rapid domestication of these technologies in many parts of the world serve to shift people's interest from the new gadgets themselves on to their function, and this is particularly true of children. For example, they rarely want a new mobile phone because of a more advanced technology, but because they want to communicate in new ways, at different times and locales (Drotner, 2005)
In the decade ahead, the largest American corporations could underwrite entire, sponsored channels. Organizations such as Procter & Gamble might circumvent public media altogether and subsidize programming that combines promotional and otherwise conducive messages (Corner and Pels2003; Baym 2005; Jones2005; van Zoonen 2005) news, talk shows, infomercials, or sponsored entertainment or sports. (Yes, the soaps might even return to sponsor origination!) Show such as "Entertainment Tonight" stand to become the prototype for programming of tomorrow, in which the source doubles as the deliverer of the message (Mindich 2005). The big advantage, of course, is that information sponsors will be able to eliminate the waste that now exists in the advertising and public information system. While per-impression costs will be higher, channel sponsors will be able to reach coveted super-heavy users, or active or aware publics, with highly tailored messages over which they exert complete control.
Mediated Constitution of the Public
It is impossible to understand the public that is both governed and yet is also supposed to govern without understanding the technologies through which it is governed, or how it is governed. The most significant aspect of the government of the public is the way that media technologies constitute the public as an agent, or more precisely as an assemblage of agents. The public is an effect of the construction, maintenance and articulation of audiences by media technologies that mediate between individuals and groups. Dahlgren' view that, the growth of media-based democratic system in the west corresponds previously with the appearance of the print media as the major institutions of the public (1991: 1) is a simple and beneficial signal of the close links between the democratic public and media. He adds that central agents in the shaping of public lives is media which emerge in the real communication of public, such that audiences should take a step in the mainframe being a member of the public (16-17).
Hartley make a similar point here, who focuses on the radical press of the French Revolution that: The public of modern technology is contiguous with the viewership of the media, and the technological media industrialised as a source to make fix types of public into being (Hartley 1996: 54). By keeping a broad consumer public, or audience, sovereignty of the people was kept into practice by the radical press enabling the people to act at a space through them. Hartley acknowledge that TV is a more modern and social technology by means of which viewership can constitute themselves as society but he also emphasizes on print journalism.
The public connected to each other by media technologies which make the public as a territory or object of government. Government owns media technologies that work in two ways: they permit the public to rule the government to some limit, at the very least by representative themselves for one another; and they need the government to make the elder people as a political public representative (Lam, 2009). The modern public can be taken as popular viewers because of advancement in technologies. Toby Miller writes, media technologies formed and reformed the public on a routine basis through which technology develops and stables the presentation of a public beyond a group of physically gathered people (Miller 1998: 5). No matter how people are far from each other, media technologies are connecting very large numbers of people to each other across great distances; media makes the mass democratic publics in the most prominent way by enabling them to act united even if they are not co-present (Thompson 1995: 236).
Print media first enabled the groupings of ideas and knowledge to public, enlarging arguments about politics ahead of the core of government (Lam, 2009)... After the invention of telegraph, networking got speed than transportation, it shows the growth of the broadcast media that joint together the huge number of public into a big group. Media takes the credit that it makes modern publics. Certainly, given the ongoing differentiation of public even at the occasion of their globalization, and the appearance of optional active public circles in comparison to the major public which is not as a single union (Dahlgren 1991: 12-15). The public sometimes represent as a one entity (the state, or the public) but mostly ranging from as a line of professions, sectors, age groups ethnic groups such as pensioners, or virtual categories whose ballot is taken essential, such as middle England.
The public as a group of viewers is set according to sections and types, but also different media divides the audiences of different types within those media, which develops different options within the fields and media. cultural technologies enables an individual becomes part of the public for being a member of an audience bound together with its knowable profile. Today's public is necessarily a mediated public, like a broader media networks struggles for bigger parts of market share, agencies try to take over a position from which they can make their position in the name of the people or the public interest, looking for political rather than consuming popular agreement. In different words, the direct objective of media technologies is to make accepted audiences as a state although some audiences are transnational to bind public to nations. (Miller 1998: 28).
Mediation Occurs beyond Information Acquisition
The eighteenth-century public, which inspired democratic theory, is of a more humble origin. It was brought into existence by the conditions of the eighteenth-century city and the printing press. The public was elevated into a social form by the news and, in turn, the primary subject of the news was the public. The public formed because urban life was sufficiently developed so that strangers were regularly thrown into contact with one another. Technology allowed dissemination of newspapers and pamphlets, which provided a common focus for discussion and conversation. (Hartmann, 2009)
It was not, as it became during the modern period, a fiction or an abstraction. It was not a group of people sitting at home watching television or privately and invisibly reading newspapers. Nor was it the results of a public opinion poll. The public space, in turn, depended on public habits, manners and talents, such as the ability to welcome strangers, to avoid intimacy, to wear a public mask and to shun the personal. As such, the public was taken to be both critical and rational. It was critical in the sense that nothing in public was taken for granted; everything was subject to argument and evidence. It was rational in the sense that the speaker was responsible for giving reasons for believing in any assertion; and there was no intrinsic appeal to authority. The public was, thus, more than a group of people or a mode of discourse: It was a seat of political power, located in the world between the state and the private sector (Hartmann, 2009). It was the only sphere in which power could wear the face of rationality, for it was the only sphere .where private interest might be transcended.
The critical factor in the relationship between the public and journalism was that journalism was not an end in itself, but was justified in terms of its ability to serve and bring into existence an actual social arrangement, a particular form of democracy as discourse in a sphere of independent, rational, influence.
In this term custom vision of communication diverts our attention on the vital new side of media. As various studies have shown, media rings public of its position in a group, country, or society. Media's role during times of conflict, war, or any emergence is like a priest to the public because media depicts the ongoing situations in any part of the world. (Hallin and Gitlin 1992; Marvin and Ingle 1999). Public also know when to rise against media, if any wrong statement or issue is depicted against their core values (Thelen 1996).
In a nut shell, a spotlight on the mediation of modern public depicts the physical and scientific directions of our mediated public lives. This does not mean that this culture of commitment necessarily gives a source of controlling the stable divergence in power and discourse occupy in society. The public should not shrink from this new metaphor. Social life is after all the succession of great metaphors. The metaphor that has governed the understanding of media in this century has run into trouble. The re-creation of public life, as dangerous and difficult as it will be in an age of advanced technology, will bring the States closer to the inspiring vision of media that has been the objective of democratic government since the colonial era. It is well understood that all social institutions have their relative certainties made possible by the centralizing power of the technologies of mass communication. The relative certainties that accompany attenuated access to the means of symbolic production are welded into the fabric of all institutional policies and practices. Assuming, then, that access to the means of cultural expression will be increasingly distributed, it follows that all of the institutions of modem society will be threatened or at least inconvenienced by this development. While expressions like "public involvement" and "participative democracy" are imbedded in our rhetorical traditions, their unquestionable acceptability has always been conditional upon their equally unquestionable nonattainability. The technologies of mass communication always ensured that involvement and participation would not be overdone.
- Baym, Geoffrey. 2005. The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication 22:259-/76.
- Corner, John, and Dick Pels, eds. 2003. Media and the restyling of politics. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
- Curran, James(1991) Rethinking the Media as a Public Sphere in P. Dahlgren and C. Sparkes(eds) Communication and Citizenship, London: Routledge.
- Dahlgren, Peter (1991) Introduction in P. Dahlgren and C. Sparkes (eds) Communication and Citizenship, London: Routledge.
- Hallin, Dan C., and Todd Gitlin. 1992. Agon and ritual: The Gulf War as popular culture and as television drama. Political Communication 10:411_/24.
- Hartley, John (1996) Popular Reality, London: Arnold.
- Hartmann Tilo. (2009) Media Choice; A Theoretical and Empirical Overview. London, Routledge.
- Kirsten, Drotner. (2005) Media on the Move: Personalised Media and the Transformation of Publicnes, pp. 187-211 in Sonia Livingstone (ed.) Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere Bristol: Intellect Books.
- Lam Celia. (2009) Tracing Audiences and New Media. Global Media Journal. University of Cydney, Australia.
- Linder, Laura R. 1999. Public access television: America's electronic soapbox. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
- Marvin, Carolyn, and David W. Ingle. 1999. Blood sacrifice and the nation: Totem rituals and the American flag. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Miller, Toby (1998) Technologies of Truth: Cultural Citizenship and the Popular Media, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Mindich, David T. Z. 2005. Tuned out: Why Americans under 40 don't follow the news. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Thelen, David. 1996. Becoming citizens in the age of television. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
- Thompson, John (1995) The Media and Modernity, Cambridge: Polity.
- Van Zoonen, Liesbet. 2005. Entertaining the citizen: When politics and popular culture converge. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.