Nonviolence: The Most Powerful and Invisible Weapon
Nonviolence is a holistic theory and practice, in which to reject aggression and violence in order to achieve goals or resolve conflicts in a constructive way. Sometimes, nonviolence is better than violence because it could damage the society. Mahatma Gandhi is the first person who started the nonviolence march in the world. He was also very nonviolent and used his widespread popularity to stop fighting by fasting until the violence stopped, and he would sometimes lead group fasts to protest against violence. He created the model of empowerment that has inspired movements throughout the world.
Nonviolence: The Most Powerful and Invisible Weapon
The invisible weapon-nonviolent civil disobedience is the most powerful way to avoid violence while fighting for some major goals. The tendency to resolve conflicts with peaceful reconciliation has been more important than violence in human evolution. In an article Liberation without War by J. Duvall says that many people believe that weapons have power, most people who want to fight for their rights or justice are more interested in winning than in being killed-and they will listen to proof that violence is less effective. Peaceful reconciliation has satisfied more people than the use of violence and it would cost a lot less than a war. Nonviolence is most effective strategy for social change, because it causes less damage, less money, and brings a peaceful and lovely condition at society.
One reason for effective of nonviolence is that damages are reduced. Violence can kill people, but it cannot stop people from fighting for their rights or justice. Mohandas K. Gandhi was the first to use nonviolence in mass political action, to win India's independence from Great Britain. He worked to improve the rights of immigrant Indians. It was there that he developed his following of passive resistance against injustice and he helped mastermind hundreds of nonviolent protests. When people want to use war to solve a problem, before they start the war, they have to think about what kind of result they will get. It does not matter if one wins the war, people will not listen to the, they cannot add something to a person where the person does not want it; that not going to work. If you refuse to give me what I want, even if I threaten you with violence, I cannot succeed unless I can pay the cost of ending your resistance. Nonviolent movements succeed when they drive up the cost of suppressing the people to the point that a regime's defenders are unwilling or unable to pay it.
The money condition should be considered for an effective of nonviolence Violence can solve a problem very fast through a war, but a war is not always the best way to solve problems. It will cost a lot of money, where is the money going to from? It is our money, we pay the taxes everyday. We do not want to see that the government uses our money to buy weapons to kill innocent people. A war does not just cost a lot of money; a lot of people will also lose their lives. People will see a lot of blood, and people do not know how many children will lose their parents, how sad is that? It is totally wrong to kill people in order to get whatever they want.
Peaceful reconciliation has been the sacrifice of fewer people rather than using violence. Those people who want to use nonviolent ways to solve problems, have peaceful hearts and do not want to see anybody die. Violence is not the best way to solve problems and it is also what a smart person would do. In the video entitled A Force More Powerful (1999) by York shows that in Tennessee, many black people went to a downtown restaurant, in the beginning the restaurant owners refuse to serve them because they are black. Later on, the restaurant owner did not want close down, they have to make money; therefore, they allow blacks to eat at there. If it happened of violence, not only the black people hurt, but also the restaurant will be damage.
Love in this context means understanding redemptive good will. In an article An Experiment in Love by M. L. King, Jr. (2006) mentions that nonviolent resistance avoids not only external physical violence but also an internal violence of the spirit. The nonviolent resister not only refuses to shoot his opponent, but he also refuses to hate him. At the center of nonviolence stands the principle of love. Along the way of life, someone must have sense enough and morality enough to cut off the chain of hate. This can only be done by projecting the ethic of love to the center of our lives. We are talking about love at this point; it would be nonsense to urge men to love their oppressors. Men are brothers, if someone harms me, they harm themselves. If all the people in this world would understand each other, then we can just throw the word “violence” away. How wonderful this world would be. Nonviolence reconciliation not only brings the world peace, but also lets the people become more close to each other. This is very important for human evolution.
If an illegal organization is violent, it will be slow to collect supporters. One instance of this is the K.K.K. An immensely violent organization the K.K.K. had a big problem keeping members, due to guilt and the general human hate of having blood on their hands. This is what killed the K.K.K.
In conclusion, believers in nonviolence have deep faith in the future. This faith is another reason why the nonviolent resister can accept suffering without retaliation. Using nonviolence is not disruptive or mischievous. It is effective for the society, it can bring a harmonious and lovely society, and in addition it causes less money and damage. However, Gandhi was a first person who had huge supporter of nonviolence, and he helped Indian independent from the British. Alice Paul and her Congressional Union for Woman Suffrage (The Library of Congress), invented techniques of nonviolent action still in use today. Nonviolence is an open and above board method of fighting for a cause, dignifying the advocates and sometimes its adversaries along the way, while highlighting the ill symptoms of any injustice or violence inherent in the system.
Duvall, J. (2006). Liberation without war. In N. Dollahite& J. Haun(Eds), Sourcework: Academic writing from sources. Boston: Thomson Heinle.
King, M. (2006). An experiment in love. In N. Dollahite& J. Haun(Eds), Sourcework: Academic writing from sources. Boston: Thomson Heinle.
The Library of Congress. Profiles: Selected leaders of the national woman's party. Retrieved April 3, 2010, from http://www.memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/suffrage/nwp/profiles.html
York, Steven. (Director). (1999). A force more powerful [video]. Hollywood; York Zimmerman.